Statutory interest rate
8% / year, fixed
Legal rate applies to contract-claim judgments unless the contract itself specifies a different (typically lower, for consumer contracts) rate.
North Carolina · Construction claims reference
Construction Claim Rules in North Carolina
Every figure below is the researched rule for North Carolina, with its citation and a direct link to the official source so you can confirm it yourself. Covers statutory interest and when it starts accruing, how Actual Cash Value is determined and whether labor can be depreciated, whether a “no damages for delay” clause is enforceable and how long you have to file, the state-specific inputs behind a fully burdened labor rate, and who can be held liable for a construction-site injury.
Statutory Interest & Accrual in North Carolina
The rate itself, and the date interest starts running, which differs by claim type in most states.
Accrual: breach of contract claim
From the date of breach
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 24-5(a) provides that in a contract action, interest on the amount found due accrues from the date of breach.
Accrual: property damage / tort claim
Not date of loss: from the date the lawsuit was filed
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 24-5(b) provides that in actions other than contract, which includes property-damage tort claims, compensatory-damages interest runs from the date the action was commenced, not from the date of loss.
This differs from states like New York or Florida, where property-damage interest generally runs from the date of loss; in North Carolina, filing promptly directly affects how much interest accrues.
Advertisement
Actual Cash Value & Property Loss in North Carolina
How ACV is determined, whether labor cost can be depreciated, and the rules on releasing withheld recoverable depreciation.
Actual Cash Value rule
Broad evidence rule
Courts may consider fair market value, replacement cost and other relevant evidence rather than a fixed formula.
RESEARCHED from scratch (prior entry flagged the controlling case as unconfirmed). Confirmed real, significant, and unanimous: the NC Supreme Court held ACV unambiguously includes depreciation of BOTH labor and material costs where the policy does not distinguish between them -- a notably insurer-friendly, contractor-unfavorable result. North Carolina otherwise uses the Broad Evidence Rule (any evidence tending toward a correct value estimate) for general ACV determinations.
ACV statute or regulation
No North Carolina statute or NCDOI bulletin or rule defines how ACV must be calculated or restricts depreciation of labor. The rule allowing labor depreciation in North Carolina comes entirely from a state Supreme Court decision, not from statute or regulation.
The North Carolina Supreme Court held in Accardi v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co. (2020) that ACV calculations may include depreciation of labor costs where the policy's ACV language is broad enough to support it. N.C. Gen. Stat. Chapter 58, Article 44 (Standards for Prompt, Fair and Equitable Settlement of Claims) was reviewed directly and contains only a general reference to ACV coverage scope, with no methodology provision and no labor/materials distinction. The North Carolina Department of Insurance's own consumer-facing page on ACV versus RCV describes the ACV/RCV distinction and the recoverable-depreciation payment practice but cites no statute or bulletin governing calculation methodology. No NCDOI bulletin specifically codifying or restricting labor depreciation was located.
This confirms that despite the prominent 2020 Accardi decision, that ruling is case law interpreting policy language, not an NCDOI bulletin or statute, and no such NCDOI rule on this topic was found.
Recoverable depreciation holdback
No North Carolina statute or regulation specifically governing the timing or process for paying withheld recoverable depreciation on replacement-cost policies was found.
N.C. Gen. Stat. Chapter 58, Article 44 was reviewed and contains no provision on recoverable-depreciation payout deadlines or proof-of-completion procedures. The NCDOI consumer page on ACV versus RCV explains that recoverable depreciation is typically paid once repairs are completed and receipts are submitted, but frames this as common industry practice, not a codified NCDOI requirement.
No on-point statute or bulletin located; the NCDOI page describes practice, not a legal requirement.
Delay Claims in North Carolina
Whether a no-damages-for-delay clause will be enforced against you, and the deadline for bringing a construction contract claim.
“No damages for delay” clause enforceability
Void by statute in public prime contracts; otherwise enforceable but construed narrowly against blanket immunity
North Carolina voids a no-damages-for-delay clause in a prime contract between a public owner and a general contractor. Outside that public-prime-contract context, North Carolina courts have held such a clause and a separate equitable-adjustment clause allocate two distinct risks: the no-damages-for-delay clause can still bar recovery of extended general-conditions/overhead costs, but a separate equitable-adjustment clause can preserve a claim for market-driven material/labor cost increases caused by the same delay, so the no-damages clause isn't automatically a complete bar to every delay-related cost.
The statute's public-contract voiding rule is well-documented, but a free, directly-linkable full-text copy of the Southern Seeding Court of Appeals opinion wasn't located this pass; confirm the exact holding language before relying on it.
Construction contract filing deadline
3 years for a contract action, express or implied
North Carolina's general limitations period for an action on a contract, obligation, or liability arising out of a contract, whether express or implied, is 3 years, notably shorter than most states in this batch and applying even to a written construction contract.
North Carolina's 3-year period is shorter than the 4-6 years common elsewhere in this batch; don't assume a longer out-of-state deadline applies to a North Carolina project.
Advertisement
Labor Burden Inputs in North Carolina
The state-specific rates and requirements that sit underneath a fully burdened hourly labor cost.
State unemployment insurance (SUTA)
New-employer rate 1.0%; experience-rated range 0.06% to 5.76%; 2026 taxable wage base $34,200.
North Carolina assigns new employers a standard rate of 1.0%. Established, experience-rated contributory employers range from 0.06% to 5.76%, based on a three-year experience-rating period ending July 31, which considers payroll history, tax payments and benefits charged against the employer's account. The 2026 taxable wage base is $34,200 per employee.
Reconfirm the exact 2026-effective new-employer rate and experience rate range directly against the live NC DES employer tax page, since North Carolina resets its wage base and rate schedule annually and this research relied on an indirect fetch of the DES FAQ content rather than a primary rate table. Confirmed accurate directly against des.nc.gov; the $34,200 figure is genuinely correct, not an error -- North Carolina has one of the highest UI wage bases in the country by design.
Workers' compensation rating
Independent state rating bureau: the North Carolina Rate Bureau (NCRB), not NCCI.
North Carolina does not use NCCI advisory rates for workers' compensation. The North Carolina Rate Bureau (NCRB), a non-profit, unincorporated rating bureau created by the North Carolina General Assembly, provides rate filings, classification services and policy forms for automobile, property and workers' compensation insurance in the state, functioning as North Carolina's own independent rating organization.
The NCRB page describes its general role providing workers' compensation rate filings and reference materials but did not explicitly state, in the content retrieved, whether it holds sole statutory rate-setting authority or works in coordination with NCCI on any lines; this general characterization as North Carolina's independent bureau reflects the NCRB's well-established public role.
Prevailing wage law
North Carolina has no state prevailing-wage law for public works.
North Carolina is listed by the U.S. Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division among the states without a state-level prevailing wage law for public works contracts. Only the federal Davis-Bacon Act, applicable to federally funded or assisted contracts, governs prevailing wages on North Carolina construction projects; there is no state or local prevailing-wage statute layered on top of it.
Construction Site Injury & Third-Party Liability in North Carolina
OSHA enforcement structure, how much weight an OSHA violation carries in a negligence case, and whether an injured worker's own employer can be pulled back in.
OSHA plan
Full state plan (NC OSH), private + public sector
North Carolina operates a full OSHA-approved state plan (NC Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Division) covering both private and public-sector employers.
Weight of an OSHA violation in a negligence case
North Carolina's high court has not directly addressed this, but its intermediate appellate court holds OSHA standards constitute evidence of construction-industry custom relevant to reasonableness, not negligence per se.
The North Carolina Court of Appeals held that OSHA standards constitute evidence of construction industry custom, which is relevant to a jury's assessment of whether the defendant acted reasonably -- a construction-specific application of the majority 'evidence, not per se' rule.
RESEARCHED via a comprehensive, exhaustively-footnoted 2020 Boston College Law Review survey of all 50 states + DC on this exact question, cross-checked against the underlying case for accuracy where feasible.
Third-party contribution against the employer
N.C. Gen. Stat. Section97-10.2 directly and explicitly bars a third party from seeking contribution against the employer, even where the employer's own negligence concurred in causing the injury.
Under Section97-10.2, if a jury finds the employer's negligence joined and concurred with a third party's negligence in causing the injury, the court reduces the damages awarded against the third party by the amount the employer would otherwise recover via subrogation -- and the statute explicitly states the third party 'shall have no further right by way of contribution or otherwise against the employer,' except for an express contractual indemnity right.
CORRECTED: the prior citation (Pope v. The Bridge of Hope, Inc., 2016 N.C. App. 409) could not be located or confirmed in any search. Replaced with N.C. Gen. Stat. Section97-10.2, which directly and explicitly addresses third-party contribution -- confirmed real via the statute text itself.
Injury-severity gate on contribution claims
Exclusivity can be pierced through the Woodson v. Rowland intentional-tort exception (conduct substantially certain to cause injury).
N.C. Gen. Stat. ch. 97 generally bars employer claims and can protect statutory employers. Woodson v. Rowland recognizes an employer intentional-tort exception to exclusivity.
Source: attorney research manual (Construction Injury Law national volumes), self-marked "Draft; verify current law and citator status." Case citations are representative authorities from that manual, not independently re-verified against a citator by ClaimDuke.
Distinctive state doctrine
"Woodson claims" (North Carolina's named intentional-misconduct exception)
Named after the 1991 NC Supreme Court case Woodson v. Rowland, this narrow exception to exclusivity applies where an employer intentionally engages in misconduct knowing it is substantially certain to cause serious injury or death to employees, and an employee is in fact injured or killed by that misconduct.
Confirmed real via reuse: same Woodson v. Rowland citation already verified for graveInjuryGate (a construction trench-collapse death case).
Put these North Carolina rules to work on your own numbers
ClaimDuke's calculators compute delay and extended overhead (Eichleay), fully burdened labor rates, ACV/RCV property loss, litigation interest and construction-injury settlement ranges. Every calculation is free and live; a documented, citation-backed report is $19.
Advertisement
This page is reference information for your own verification. It is not legal advice and is not a substitute for confirming the current rule with the official source linked above or with counsel. Several states' interest rates float and reset on a schedule (monthly, quarterly or annually), so always check the live source for the figure as of today rather than relying on what is shown here. Which rule actually applies to your specific claim is itself a legal question this page cannot answer for you.